The Federal Trade Commision (FTC), along with the Attorneys General of D.C. and California, announced Monday they are officially challenging the proposed upcoming merger between FanDuel and DraftKings.

The FTC complaint states “DraftKings and FanDuel are each other's most significant competitor, and the combined firm would hold more than 90% of the U.S. market. According to the FTC's complaint, consumers of paid daily fantasy sports are unlikely to view season-long fantasy sports contests as a meaningful substitute.” (

The complaint also adds “consumers of paid daily fantasy sports are unlikely to view season-long fantasy sports contests as a meaningful substitute for paid daily fantasy sports, due to the length of season-long contests, the limitations on number of entrants and several other issues. The complaint also alleges that entry or expansion by other providers is not likely to provide timely or sufficient competition to offset the anticompetitive effects of the merger. The complaint also asserts that purported efficiencies would not offset the likely competitive harm.

The Commission votes to issue the administrative complaint and to authorize staff to seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in federal court were both 2-0. The administrative trial is scheduled to begin on November 21, 2017.

What we still don’t know is how educated the FTC and these AG’s are on exactly what daily fantasy sports is, as well as the current state of the industry.  Are the smaller daily fantasy sites on-board for stopping this?  Industry experts have showed research proving those who play fantasy sports, play in multiple season-long leagues, as well as play on more than one daily fantasy site. 

The FTC’s role is to promote competition and education, but they cannot provide sites with millions of dollars of paid advertising and/or large GPP prize pools (guaranteed prize pools).  Yahoo, a billion-dollar-plus company of its own, hasn’t tried to offer over one million dollars in prizes on any given day yet.  DraftKings though, just added one million dollars to a player’s account balance from a $33 entry fee golf tournament. 

If you look at just that golf tournament alone, the prize pool was $3.5 million, but DraftKings lost $389,004 from not filling the contest.  With $3 of the entry fee going to DraftKings, they lost a little over $39,000 in that contest.  That doesn’t include all those commercials we watched over the week from them. 

It was just three years ago when DraftKings bought the third largest site in DraftStreet, and few months late acquired StarStreet

Since that time three years ago, we’ve seen several new sites to come and go, while others continue to remain, finding newer ways to attract players.  FantasyDraft has developed multiple live meet-and-greet opportunities, including the latest one, golfing with Drew Brees.  Events like that, as well as a prize structure which pays out more places, and yes, fewer top-heavy payouts, will continue to attract new players. Even those who choose to chase the top-heavy prizes on the major sites.  Other sites like Draft and Boom have a platform that provides consumers with different styles of fantasy games as well.

Do I miss sites like DailyJoust and DraftStreet still? Absolutely!  Do I feel like the industry should look at a way to bring back the concept that FantasyHub had about giving back? 100% yes.    I would feel the same way about losing either FanDuel or DraftKings with the merger, but competition through different styles of games offering different types of prizes piques my interest more than every fantasy site offering $5 million in guaranteed prizes every weekend this NFL season.

We will continue to update you on news of the potential merger.